Federal Marriage Amendment Re-introduced in Senate

We must move to outlaw Santorum on man and Santorum on dog sex as soon as possible! It's all the poor feller can think about.

"Infamous" ruling, huh, Jethro? Marriage equality might take awhile yet in this country, but get used to lots of moves - legislative, corporate, judicial - towards more equal rights for g/l/b/t people. You should probably all move to the Phelps compound at your earliest convenience, as that's one place that will likely remain sympathetic to your bigoted views.

With Sen. Craig and Vitter on the side of the "pro family" advocates I don't see what could possible go wrong.

I heard a no doubt false rumor (wink, wink,) that after his Senate colleagues tried to through him under the bus that Sen. Craig threatened to out, imo, "high school wrestling coach" and well known bottom Denise Hastert and Delay unless they gave up their posts. That wasn't about the new lobbying laws which might have limited their potential pork; it was about the porking, imo.

In the meantime, we should find out what Phyllis Schlafly's openly gay son's wide stance on this legislation is....

It has no chance to pass. It's hilarious that a known gay republican is authoring it. I guess he's afraid he'll marry his boyfriend if it becomes legal in his state.

Writing in Paradise wrote:

It has no chance to pass. It's hilarious that a known gay republican is authoring it. I guess he's afraid he'll marry his boyfriend if it becomes legal in his state.

It's usually the twisted closeted ones who shout the loudest for discrimination--as a smokescreen for their own issues.

Pathetic.

Homosexual "marriage" is a fraud. It is only a political charade.

No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron. In Belgium, Spain, and South Africa, for example, fewer than 1/2 of 1% of homosexual has "married." Participation in the Netherlands, where it all began, has been in a complete nosedive since the initial political charade began.

Homosexual "marriage" is a cruel lie.

And there is Wil with his political charade.

Roe wrote:

Homosexual "marriage" is a fraud. It is only a political charade.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron. In Belgium, Spain, and South Africa, for example, fewer than 1/2 of 1% of homosexual has "married." Participation in the Netherlands, where it all began, has been in a complete nosedive since the initial political charade began.
Homosexual "marriage" is a cruel lie.

From June 2003 (date of the first legal same-sex marriages in Ontario) to October 2006, there were 12,438 same-sex marriages contracted in Canada.

I don't have a number for the last 2 years, but I'd say thats significant.

Imprtnrd wrote:

And there is Wil with his political charade.

Oh god!!! I've been off of here for over a year and Wil is still at it? What would motivate a person to keep posting the same inane blather?

I'll never understand the life of a troll.

Don't feed the trolls!

victoria1 wrote:

<quoted text>
From June 2003 (date of the first legal same-sex marriages in Ontario) to October 2006, there were 12,438 same-sex marriages contracted in Canada.
I don't have a number for the last 2 years, but I'd say thats significant.

Victoria, if this is the same person as from a year ago, there is no point in arguing. He pulls statistics out of thin air and never backs them up. The more you argue, the dumber he gets.

Don't feed the trolls!

Finally the government is acting sanely. Homosexual "marriage" is a farce.

Fort Myers wrote:

Finally the government is acting sanely. Homosexual "marriage" is a farce.

LOL

Uh huh.

Patrick wrote:

<quoted text>
Victoria, if this is the same person as from a year ago, there is no point in arguing. He pulls statistics out of thin air and never backs them up. The more you argue, the dumber he gets.
Don't feed the trolls!

Ah, I wasn't here a year ago, so I had no idea. Well my statistics are directly from the Govt of Canada, so I know I am correct.

And people wonder why there are no jobs and gas is 5 dollars a gallon. Can anyone tell me how a homosexual couple being together affects your pocket book???? Please list examples.

Alg2772917 wrote:

And people wonder why there are no jobs and gas is 5 dollars a gallon. Can anyone tell me how a homosexual couple being together affects your pocket book???? Please list examples.

Of course, idiot. We'd all have to pay for the discriminatory benefits and subsidies.

Why not forget homosexual "marriage" and deal with real issues?

Homosexual "marriage" is a fraud. It is only a political charade.

No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron. In Belgium, Spain, and South Africa, for example, fewer than 1/2 of 1% of homosexual has "married." Participation in the Netherlands, where it all began, has been in a complete nosedive since the initial political charade began.

Homosexual "marriage" is a cruel lie.

Alg2772917 wrote:

And people wonder why there are no jobs and gas is 5 dollars a gallon. Can anyone tell me how a homosexual couple being together affects your pocket book???? Please list examples.

I can...

Gay Pride week brings $100 million in revenue to city of Toronto

http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_24295.aspx

BEAT THAT WITH A STICK

Hoyt wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course, idiot. We'd all have to pay for the discriminatory benefits and subsidies.
Why not forget homosexual "marriage" and deal with real issues?
Homosexual "marriage" is a fraud. It is only a political charade.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron. In Belgium, Spain, and South Africa, for example, fewer than 1/2 of 1% of homosexual has "married." Participation in the Netherlands, where it all began, has been in a complete nosedive since the initial political charade began.
Homosexual "marriage" is a cruel lie.

And /ignore
It's easy.
Don't reply to unregistered posters from IL or FL.
It's a waste of time.

Patrick wrote:

<quoted text>
And /ignore
It's easy.
Don't reply to unregistered posters from IL or FL.
It's a waste of time.

Yeah they're just spammers and waste of skin, but I couldnt help the last post, because he wanted me to list examples of how it helps society, so i did :D

victoria1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah they're just spammers and waste of skin, but I couldnt help the last post, because he wanted me to list examples of how it helps society, so i did :D

Oh...I like you...I always get suckered into spammers too. I guess I was just reminding myself not to fall into their diabolically thoughtless traps.

Hoyt wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course, idiot. We'd all have to pay for the discriminatory benefits and subsidies.
Why not forget homosexual "marriage" and deal with real issues?
Homosexual "marriage" is a fraud. It is only a political charade.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron. In Belgium, Spain, and South Africa, for example, fewer than 1/2 of 1% of homosexual has "married." Participation in the Netherlands, where it all began, has been in a complete nosedive since the initial political charade began.
Homosexual "marriage" is a cruel lie.

The push for gay "marriage" is to make everyone else pay for the AIDS their lifestyle spreads. Gays contract AIDS, then get "married" so the insurance kicks in.

Fort Myers wrote:

Finally the government is acting sanely. Homosexual "marriage" is a farce.

so is hetersexual marriage, ever watch divorce court? If you guys can't get it right, you shouldn't have a problem with us trying it.